Page Seventy-Three

18 MARCH 2006

Rule Britannia.

 

 

29º | Hi 31º / Lo 19º |
 
 
British firm may buy ferry
Foreign media suggest it would be used for crossings to France

(March 18, 2006) — A newly formed company in England reportedly is negotiating to buy Rochester's high-speed ferry for service on the English Channel.

At least four separate media outlets in England and France linked Navmed Limited and the Rochester-controlled Spirit of Ontario in stories late this week. Navmed reportedly is interested in a ferry to run between Dover, England, and Boulogne, France. The ferry would be part of a three-ship operation to start in May between multiple ports.

Rochester spokesman and ferry board member Gary Walker said, however, that the city is not in final discussions with any company, and he left the validity of Navmed's claim in doubt.

What's at stake
Your money. The higher the sale price for the ferry, the less remaining debt will be assumed by the city to be repaid with taxpayer money. For previous stories about the ferry.

"We've got movement. We've got interest. We've got serious talks with persons interested in the ferry," Walker said. "But we've got no done deal yet. ... We haven't entered into the end-game negotiations."

Mayor Robert Duffy decided Jan. 10 to end the Rochester-to-Toronto service and sell the ship after the operation lost $10 million in 10 months. The city-run Rochester Ferry Co. was broke and manager Bay Ferries Great Lakes LLC covered $3.2 million in expenses. Debt from the ferry venture exceeds $40 million, including the expense of buying the ship. The vessel remains docked at the Port of Rochester.

Navmed and its financial backers plan to invest more than $52 million (U.S.) in a plan that includes two other high-speed ferries crossing between Dover and Calais, France, and possibly other ports, the media reports said. The previous Dover-to-Calais service shut down in November, citing financial losses. The Dover-to-Boulogne route would duplicate a service in operation since May 2004, according to the respective company Web sites.

Navmed, also called Navmed-Highspeedferries and based in Folkestone, England, did not respond to an e-mail Friday. (One can only wonder, 'Why not?')  Attempts to locate a telephone number were unsuccessful.

Tom Richards, Rochester's corporation counsel, has said that he would not discuss details until a ferry deal is final.

City Councilman and ferry board President Benjamin Douglas also declined comment, saying the matter is "within the realm of whatever delicate negotiations are going on."

Should the ship be sold to a location outside the Great Lakes, it would be taken out through the St. Lawrence Seaway, which opens for the season Thursday. Seaway officials said the city has not contacted them about moving the ferry. (That would tend to indicate there may be no destination to move it to, no?  As in, nobody's interested?)

Walker said the city has no specific timetable for the ferry.  (Well, OK.  But the payments are still due.)

BDSHARP@DemocratandChronicle.com

Oh.  You guys talkin' about this?

imageimage


Saturday, March 18, 2006   
 
Today's Top News
Hundreds of jobs in pipeline with ferry firm

by Graham Tutthill

A FERRY company is about to advertise 500 jobs for a new passenger service from Dover to Calais and Boulogne. A formal announcement is expected next week.

Navmed Limited has been formed by former Hoverspeed employees and is renting offices at Folkestone Harbour from Roger De Haan.

It is launching a new passenger ferry service from Dover in May and hopes to reinstate Folkestone’s link with Boulogne - probably in 2007 - once Folkestone Harbour has been redeveloped.

They will use three ships from Dover, and may also look to run a service to Ostend, possibly next year.  (So how does the Rochester contingent manage to arrive at "British firm may buy ferry" from this?)

Jeff Richards, of Navmed, said: "We set up offices in Folkestone because we couldn’t find any suitable in Dover.

"We will run services from Dover to Calais and Boulogne and hope to start in May. We are looking at Folkestone, but there is a huge amount of work which needs to be done to the port.

"A summer service from Folkestone would seem to be very attractive to people."

Navmed is about to advertise around 500 jobs for the Dover operation, but it is understood that not all of them will be recruited from the UK.

Mr De Haan is due to unveil his masterplan for the Folkestone Harbour area to members of Shepway District Council on Monday. The plans have been drawn up by architect Sir Norman Foster.

Brits to Rochester: "Thank you, no.  Go peddle your boat elsewhere."

Oh my.  As of this Thursday, the Seaway is open and the Rochester ferry can sail out of the Great Lakes at anytime to the new owner's dock located at ____ ?  I mean, what's the point of hanging on to a ship that has no future in the Great Lakes?  The financially prudent thing to do would be to get rid of it as soon as possible to cut the losses.

Up to now, the Seaway has been closed and even if the celebrated barge WAS sold, it couldn't go anywhere.  But now that the Seaway escape route is opening, the only thing that's keeping it from becoming a memory is a ready and willing new buyer.  The payments just keep on coming due and there's the issue of maintenance and support staff which keeps the meter running as well.  Getting rid of it is critical to saving money... as even if a great selling price were realized, the overhead of paying for a ship sitting still will offset any cheerful news of a generous winning offer.

But then, the financial geniuses and community 'leaders' of Rochester know all this, right?

Ex-Mayor Bill Johnson can only be blamed for so long, then the culpability shifts to those who're sitting on their thumbs and not aggressively trying to unload this Flower City embarrassment.

Sell the damn thing already.  You guys made this stinking mess, now clean it up.

Useless twits....

 

22 MARCH 2006

Something strange is going on.

Logo: Rochester DemocratandChronicle.com  
 
 
City in no hurry on $30 million ferry bid
Ship has many suitors, says Duffy; 'can't put timeline' on deal

(March 22, 2006) — An overseas investor interested in Rochester's high-speed ferry said he is willing to pay more than the $30 million he offered for the ship earlier this month, but the city does not appear interested.

"As it looks like right now, they are not going to give it to us," John Paul Airs, CEO of Shikara Holdings LLC, said in a phone interview. "I think it's become too political now, and I think they're looking for a blue chip operation. We're a new company ... but you've got to start somewhere."

Shikara is the investment arm of Navmed Limited, based in Folkestone, England. How city officials view Navmed's bid for Rochester's Spirit of Ontario ferry is unclear. But the company's vocal interest mirrored in the foreign press has sparked a flurry of media attention here. Navmed plans a three-ship operation crossing the English Channel, with the Spirit of Ontario tagged for a route between Dover, England, and Boulogne, France.

What's at stake
Your money. The city needs to recoup as much out of the ferry venture as it can. The higher the sales price, the less the remaining debt assumed by the city that would be repaid with taxpayer money.

City officials have declined to comment on specific interest shown in the ferry. Mayor Robert Duffy said Tuesday that the ship has not been sold but the city continues to negotiate with several potential buyers. He has said the city is not negotiating with Navmed, which would be the ship operator, but it is unclear whether Shikara has a seat at the table.

"We are having a lot of activity," Duffy said. "We certainly have negotiations going on with a number of parties. ... I really can't put a timeline on it. The deal has not been finalized yet — any deal."

The city backed a $40 million loan last year and created Rochester Ferry Co., which bought the ship in February 2005 for $32 million. But ticket sales for the resurrected Rochester-to-Toronto service lagged and the venture lost $10 million in 10 months.

Duffy announced Jan. 10 that the city was pulling the plug and would sell the ship, which remains docked at the Port of Rochester.

Airs, who also is Navmed's CEO, said he signed and submitted a $30 million bid to the city more than 10 days ago to meet a city deadline but the city has yet to respond.

"We have never snubbed or directly not answered an offer from a serious buyer," city spokesman Gary Walker said, describing the city's negotiating efforts as professional, forthright and honest.

"But we can't really control how other folks or other entities characterize this."

Airs said he has "proven" to the city his company has $30 million available, and to Port of Dover officials that it has the equivalent of $54 million (U.S.). Shikara formed in April 2005 and gets its money from Middle Eastern investors, Airs said. Navmed formed last month.

He said the Spirit of Ontario is "like a pair of Italian shoes, handmade and a perfect fit."

"We would like to discuss our bid," said Airs, who has yet to inspect the ship but claims to have reviewed all pertinent documents and drawings. He planned to come see the ship once he was on solid footing with the city.

"We're waiting. I keep hearing they (Rochester officials) are going to write."

One broker who claims to have spoken with Duffy and Corporation Counsel Tom Richards says there should only be one qualification: "Money. M-O-N-E-Y," said ship broker Bill Mollard with Jacque Pierot Jr. & Sons in New York. Mollard said he last spoke with Richards on Feb. 2 but has not heard back. Selling the ship should take 30 to 60 days, he said.

"It isn't complicated. It's a piece of steel that's sitting on Lake Ontario," he said, adding that the ship's attributes and good condition would make for a quick sale but buyers must be able to deliver the money up front.

Overseas, Navmed is reportedly one of two potential operators — the other reportedly a company called Fidentia — vying to start up a new service at the already busy Dover port. Keith Southey, spokesman for the Port of Dover, said discussions have been ongoing for some time with unresolved details that include berthing slots to dock the ships.

"When this sale is done, and we're counting the money ... we'll be willing to share every step of the negotiations with the public and the media," Walker said.  (Uh-huh.  This sounds vaguely familiar.)

"But we're not going to share that information in the middle of negotiations. It's too important ... we want to get the most we can for this boat."

BDSHARP@DemocratandChronicle.com

Includes reporting by staff writer James Goodman.

Throwing away silver to look for gold, are we?

OK.  Might as well get the best buck for the barge.. that way, we can brag how much money we recouped from the debacle even though the amount of money from a really great bid is offset by the additional cost of keeping the boat on the city's list of assets and is increasing with each passing day.

But, in the world of politics, the braindead taxpayers will only be paying attention to the final sale price and not the amount of cash that's being spent until then.

Just business as usual in a community more concerned with superficial fluff instead of pragmatic substance.  Proof positive that they really CAN'T tell it from shinola.


On my usual forays to the Great White North, the folks have been slipping comments about the ferry into conversation once they learn I live in the Rochester area.  More snickering than sympathetic, the Canadians have been wasting no amount of glee to take potshots at American follies and I've been hearing two primary themes: Bush and the ferry... in that order.

Fair enough.  When a country keeps hearing of the infallibility of the southern neighbours, it's sort of nice to point out the repeated flops which prove otherwise.  The Lake Ontario basin residents are all too familiar with the ferry idiocy based in the Image Capital and the northern contingent won't soon forget the hoopla which amounted to nothing.

And Bush's demagoguery is cause for alarm in the north... as it is around the world.  But 'we're Americans and we don't care what others think about us anyway'.  I digress.

"Shikara formed in April 2005 and gets its money from Middle Eastern investors, Airs said."

Oh.  Is that supposed to be relevant?  Has the scourge and paranoia of the Middle East reached to the shores of Lake Ontario yet?  Must be. 

Or maybe it's just the D&C appealing to the American public's hatred of All Things Within 2000 Miles of Iraq.  It worked for Dubai, so it'll work for some civilian boat rusting in an obscure port in a place the majority of the world never heard of and has even less interest in.

It's getting so I don't dare turn up the volume on Tarkan's Bounce for fear of the neighbours running to call the folks at Homeland Security.  Those Turkish dance DJ's spin tunes which sound too much like Islamic call for prayers, doncha know?  Must mean that Native dude is up to no good.

Americans not only invented hypercriticism, they've cornered the market on wholesale paranoia as well.


A lesson on rust in the local environment.

Ever notice how car and truck bodies seem to rot faster in the spring than the winter?  As temperatures rise and the saline solution of salted slush begins to seep in every crevice, metal is bathed in the corrosive crap and ferrous oxide takes hold.  That's rust.

Some metals stand up better than others; aluminum and stainless steel are a little more durable but one is hard pressed to find cars and trucks made of the stuff.  Audi's have aluminum body parts for that reason.

The ferry is weathering away at the Port of Rochester... as it's been sitting exposed to the local elements since the plug was pulled from the operation.  I'm not about to pretentiously assume I'm any sort of a ship builder, but I have to believe NO vessel is able to be tied-up indefinitely without starting to show signs of decay.  No, the ship probably isn't going to sink next week from massive hull rusting, but neither is it going to be in any better shape.

If the ship had been stored in a VERY big boathouse, it wouldn't age as quickly as it already has.  Make sense?  But considering the size of such a boathouse would engulf the majority of the Port of Rochester, that wasn't a possibility.  Neither was the city able to drop on down to AutoZone and pick up the ferry equivalent of a car cover.  So the ship rusts and last year's new paint job is beginning to look like Merle's '84 GMC and that doesn't warm the cockles of prospective buyers.

City of Rochester?  Go ahead and fuss about whether those A-rabs might have investments in a potential buyer of the ferry.  If that's more important than saving money to be able to provide funding for education, housing and safety, then your priorities might need a closer examination.

But then, we knew that already.

 

23 MARCH 2006

Why rush now?  It's only money.

Logo: Rochester DemocratandChronicle.com  
 
Dream boat
Good strategy for the city to sift through ferry suitors
 

(March 23, 2006) — The lady is attractive and available and the suitors are lining up — calling, writing, some with more ardor than others. But she'd be smart to stay cool and collected amid the attention — a rush into romance often ends badly.

The lady in this case isn't a lady but the Spirit of Ontario, Rochester's sleek ferry now out of the lake-crossing business. Given the quality and relative newness of the vessel — a catamaran designed to hold nearly 800 — the city has been wise thus far to assess the interest, and bank accounts, of potential buyers but not to leap too soon.

The goal, obviously, is to get the best price possible from a buyer who has resources beyond a convincing spiel. An England-based company has made an impressive bid but later complained that the city wasn't sufficiently appreciative of its generous offer.

The bidder apparently is feeling rather snubbed. Better a snubbed feeling or two among bidders than a snookered feeling in Rochester, having sold the ship to a business that can't make its payments.

The deal-making can't go on too long, however. Even a docked ferry brings costs, and the goal should be to sell the ship before the city has to dip again into the taxpayers' pockets. Obviously, too, buyers are looking to land a ferry before the summer season unfolds.

But Mayor Robert Duffy has a team — former Rochester Gas and Electric Corp. CEO Tom Richards stands out in this regard — experienced and able enough to find real love among the pretenders. (Oh my, yes!  The local utility extortionist has a sparkling track record at looking out for the best interests of the consumer.)

"Better a snubbed feeling or two among bidders than a snookered feeling in Rochester, having sold the ship to a business that can't make its payments."

That is, assuming the city holds the mortgage on the ship once it's sold.  Which would be about as idiotic as the city buying the ship in the first place... which means that's probably what the city is willing to do.

How stupid is that?  Pretty damn foolish and it solves nothing; one would think that after the city came close to defaulting on its loan to EFIC, it would realize that prospective borrowers/operators of such a highly risky and speculative business would stand a better-than-average chance of defaulting on the loan.  Which, of course, leaves the holder of the mortgage holding the bag.  Why in the name of all that's reasonable would the city of Rochester place itself in such a position?

What would Toronto do?  Naturally I'm biased, but it seems to me that any metropolitan area which is bursting at the seams with growth and development -- and is consistently named as one of the world's most desirable and livable cities -- wouldn't attain such a position by making foolish business decisions.  Holding onto the mortgage of a ship which has yet to turn a profit since it first hit the water is a recipe for further financial disaster.

My guess is Toronto would sell the ship to the first buyer with a decent offer who could get the financial backing from a bank.  That way, the bank assumes the risk of a default and not the city.  It's called Risk Management, but evidently the Rochester City Council has yet to hear of such a premise... they approved the buying of a failed business which resulted in the loss of $10 million in ten months, didn't they?

And once again, the city of Rochester 'leaders' are playing fast and loose with public monies by keeping the facts of the sale under wraps... then springing the details very much after the fact once a deal has been reached.  Sound familiar?

A few questions.  Just how disassociated are the local residents from their own government?  How stupid do they see themselves and how stupid are their elected officials telling them they are?

Power to the people.  It's far past time locals grabbed their political hacks by the necks and gave them a good bitch slap upside the head.  When are Rochester area residents going to take back control of their own community?  Local citizens groups waddle into meetings with homemade hand-scrawled placards whining about anything and everything, but as far as bringing in lawyers to threaten legal action to force the community 'leaders' to toe the line, they wimp out.  Too reactionary.  Too radical. 

Too efficient. To next page

Nothing like the threat of termination to get the employees to follow orders.  It works on the Average Jane and Joe... and it'll work on those who see themselves as 'above average' as well.